Oil and water? Energy and ESG during the financial crash

by: , Head of ESG Client Portfolio Management, Candriam
  • The outperformance of ESG strategies during the market upheaval of 1Q 2020 can only partly be explained by the tendency of these strategies to be underweight in the energy sector. Other factors, such as positioning within the energy sector also contribute to the outperformance of ESG. 
  • Oil is not an alternative to renewable energy for power generation as oil represents only 5% of global power generation sources. Therefore there is little potential to substitute oil for renewable energy. Natural gas is a substitute; however natural gas prices are only partially correlated with oil prices. Weak oil does not necessarily translate into cheap natural gas, nor does weak oil necessarily make renewables less competitive.
  • The transition to renewables is as much a market phenomenon as a political decision. As long as the political will holds firm — and all the signs so far is that it will — demand for renewables should remain solid, no matter how cheap oil becomes.

Oil prices have dropped dramatically since the end of February, reaching levels not seen since the 1990s. This collapse was triggered by the inability of Saudi Arabia and Russia to agree on production cuts (at least until mid-April), leading the Saudis to dump cheap oil in a market where demand was already depressed by the Covid-19-induced slowdown. The current situation raises a number of questions, both about the impact of weak oil prices on ESG investment performance and, separately but not unrelated, about the incentive for investors to support the energy transition.

Underweight oil and gas is not the whole story

Market commentators have noted that a number of ESG funds have outperformed both their non-ESG peers and their benchmark since the beginning of the Covid-19 crisis, which for Europe and the US can be dated from early March. This is also the time at which oil prices began their nose dive.

Hence the question: Do weak oil prices explain the ESG outperformance, considering that many ESG strategies were underweight the energy sector? Being underweight in an underperforming sector clearly played a role, but not one big enough to explain the ESG outperformance. Oil & gas companies only represent around 5% of the MSCI World index even if in some asset classes, such as high yield bonds, oil & gas companies still make up a significant share of the market. Unconventional oil & gas has been hit harder, and smaller producers hit more than larger and more solid companies. Since ESG analysis tends to guide away from bituminous sands or hydraulic ‘fracking’ activities, ESG strategies, even when invested in energy companies, were able to avoid the brunt of the oil-price-related elements of the crash.

Most of our strategies do not exclude oil companies. Our ESG analysis leads us to favor those which are the most advanced in their environmental practices. It was these oil & gas securities which were less punished by investors on a relative basis.

Does cheap oil threaten the energy transition?

Are weak oil prices likely to derail the energy transition? After all, cheaper oil prices means that it has become financially more attractive to burn oil than it was before. First, it is interesting to note that renewable energy stocks do not exhibit a significant correlation with oil prices, as shown in the chart below.

Figure 1: Oil price versus sustainable energy equities

 

WTI prices based on CL1 Commodity Index. Source: Bloomberg, Sustainalytics, as of 3/31/20. Past performance is not indicative of future results. An investment cannot be made in an index.

Sustainalytics notes that oil only makes up a relatively small share of global power generation, where it is competing with renewable energy sources. This might seem counterintuitive but whilst oil represents the largest share of primary energy consumption globally, at around 34%, it only makes up about 5% for power generation. Coal and natural gas together represent over 60% of power generation energy sources.

The relative attractiveness of renewable energy is hence more linked with natural gas prices than oil prices. Natural gas prices do not move in lockstep with oil prices due to different market dynamics and because gas contracts tend to be negotiated to cover several years of supply, making gas spot prices less relevant than for the oil market. Therefore it is not clear at all that the recent weak oil prices will significantly impact demand for renewable energy; much will depend on the duration of low oil prices. A longer period of sub-$30 bbl oil could shift some demand from natural gas to oil, where there is possibility to substitute, depressing demand for natural gas. It remains too early to tell.

Politics and engagement remain key protagonists

Finally there is the fact that the energy transition is as much a political achievement as a market-driven process. While renewable energy sources that can compete in terms of cost with fossil energy makes for an easier sell to investors and market participants, the energy transition still is, and needs to be, supported by a strong political will. And what does the Covid-19 crisis demonstrate, if not that governments are willing and able to step up when a global threat endangers the lives of millions of people. Climate change is another such global threat, except that the symptoms manifest themselves not directly by weakening the immune system, but indirectly by creating conditions where diseases can spread, human habitat is destroyed, and food supplies dwindle. In Europe the current European Commission has been at the forefront on addressing climate change, launching an agenda including financing initiatives and new regulations, such as the one defining what can be considered as a ‘green’ activity. Oil & coal are definitely not part of that category, at any price. On top of that, addressing the risks of future viruses which may spread from wild animal species to humans involves similar solutions as some of those which are being advocated to tackle climate change — such as preserving virgin forests and reversing the global destruction of biodiversity. It is not a choice between tackling two global risks. They are interrelated; neither problem cannot be addressed whilst ignoring the other.

Concurrently, this crisis does not signal the end for oil. It still represents around 34% of global primary energy consumption. Rather than ignoring oil companies, our role as investors is to make sure they ‘up their game’ when it comes to reducing their negative environmental externalities, and use their huge balance sheets to support the energy transition. At Candriam we have long supported shareholder resolutions asking oil companies to integrate the Paris Agreement requirements in their strategic planning. We have also advocated directly with several of them to withdraw their support for lobby groups spreading false information on climate change. We need more investors engaging with oil companies, not fewer.

One does not make a problem disappear by looking the other way.

West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is a crude oil that serves as one of the main global oil benchmarks.

The S&P 500 Global Clean Energy Index provides liquid and tradable exposure to 30 companies from around the world that are involved in clean energy related businesses.

All investments are subject to market risk, including possible loss of principal. Diversification cannot assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market.

High yield securities (junk bonds) have speculative characteristics and present a greater risk of loss than higher quality debt securities. These securities can also be subject to greater price volatility.

Opinions expressed above are subject to change at any time, are not guaranteed and should not be considered investment advice.

Certain information may constitute “forward-looking” statements, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” expect,” “estimate,” or “believe” or other variations thereof. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.

This material represents an assessment of the market environment as at a specific date; is subject to change; and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding the funds or any issuer or security in particular.

The strategies discussed are strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. There is no guarantee that any strategies discussed will be effective. The opinions expressed are those of Epoch Investment Partners, Inc. as of the date of this report and are subject to change. There is no guarantee that any forecast made will come to pass. This material does not constitute investment advice and is not intended as an endorsement of any specific investment.

This material contains general information only and does not take into account an individual’s financial circumstances. This information should not be relied upon as a primary basis for an investment decision. Rather, an assessment should be made as to whether the information is appropriate in individual circumstances and consideration should be given to talking to a financial advisor before making an investment decision.

The MSCI World Index ©is a broad global equity index that represents large and mid-cap equity performance across 23 developed markets countries. With 1,654 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.

New York Life Investment Management LLC engages the services of federally registered advisors. Candriam is affiliated with New York Life Investments.

“New York Life Investments” is both a service mark, and the common trade name, of certain investment advisors affiliated with New York Life Insurance Company. Securities are distributed by NYLIFE Distributors LLC, 30 Hudson Street, Jersey City, NJ 07302. NYLIFE Distributors LLC is a Member FINRA/SIPC.

1854095

David Czupryna

Head of ESG Client Portfolio Management, Candriam

David has been Head of ESG Client Portfolio Management at Candriam since joining the firm in September 2018. As a member of the team of ESG analysts and portfolio managers, David’s role is to deliver Candriam’s unique blend of sustainability credentials and market wisdom to European investors.

Full Bio

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published.