Why Insured Municipal Bonds Make Sense Today

by: , Director, Product Management, New York Life Investments; Maria Rahni, CFA, Director, Product Management, New York Life Investments

Role of Insurance

Municipal bond insurance is a guarantee from a monoline insurance company that the holder of a muni bond will receive scheduled interest and principal payments when due, even in the event of a default by its issuer. Municipal bond insurance is often described as a credit enhancement as it enables a municipality to effectively borrow the credit rating of the insurer, which is typically higher than its own on the rating scale. This credit enhancement can help to reduce the borrowing costs of the issuer.

The history of municipal bond insurance can be traced back to 1971 with the founding of Ambac, the industry’s first monoline insurer. The industry gained traction in the mid-1980s after the Washington Public Power Supply System defaulted on $2.25 billion in revenue bonds and by 2005, insured bonds made up 57% of total municipal bond issuance and were guaranteed by nine firms, seven of which carried AAA ratings. Meanwhile, in the early to mid-2000s, the insurers diversified their businesses by insuring structured debt settlements that were backed by risky subprime mortgages.

When the subprime mortgage crisis took hold in 2007-2008 and severely impacted the structured debt market, most of the monoline insurers either fell into bankruptcy and folded or lost their AAA ratings. Today, Assured Guaranty and Build America Mutual are the only two firms writing new business and they were most recently rated AA. The market share of new municipal issues carrying insurance dropped steeply and has hovered around 5-6% since 2014.

Why Invest in Insured Munis?

Why would someone want to invest in insured municipal bonds? The most obvious reason is the reduction in credit risk: if an issuer goes bankrupt, holders of an insured bond from the issuer are still guaranteed their principal and interest, which should help mitigate market depreciation of affected bonds. While muni defaults are rare, this extra protection could provide better price stability, greater market liquidity and improved investor outcomes over time. Moreover, the incremental price of owning an insured bond over its uninsured counterpart is relatively low – investors give up only a trivial amount of yield, just 10-15 bps, when they choose a bond with credit enhancement.

Historically speaking, investors would have been better off by carving out a piece of their investment grade muni portfolio for insured bonds. As displayed in Figure 1, the insured municipal market, as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays Insured Municipal Bond Index, has outperformed with less downside capture compared to the broad muni market over the last 5 years, as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Municipal Bond Index. Additionally, Figure 2 shows that insured munis have seen better risk-adjusted returns vs. the broad muni market over multiple time periods.

Figure 1 – Insured muni bonds have seen 5-year cumulative returns of 22.5% (4.15% annualized) vs. the broader market at 19.1% (3.56% annualized)

Source: Morningstar, 4/30/2014 – 4/30/2019.

Figure 2 – Insured municipal bonds have seen higher returns and typically less risk than the broader muni market, leading to higher Sharpe ratios (risk-adjusted returns) over time

Source: Morningstar as 4/30/2019.

How to Implement into Your Muni Portfolio

How much of your portfolio should you allocate to insured muni bonds? Like any other allocation decision, this is dependent on a number of factors including a client’s risk tolerance, income needs and market views. Investors concerned about credit risk may want greater exposure to insured munis, but less conservative investors can also benefit from investing in this part of the muni market and subsequently diversifying their portfolios.

Below is an example of a muni bond portfolio investing in both the investment grade and high yield segments of the market, with return and risk statistics before and after adding an insured muni sleeve. As shown below, replacing 20% of the portfolio with insured munis increased return and reduced risk, all while keeping the allocation to high yield and investment grade intact.

Figure 3 – Hypothetical portfolio example: replacing part of an investor’s investment grade muni allocation could result in better risk-adjusted returns

Source: Morningstar, 4/30/2014 – 4/30/2019.

Conclusion

Today’s muni market is reminiscent of the 1980s given recent credit events, specifically, the high-profile defaults in Detroit and Puerto Rico. These examples illustrate the value of insurance, which became apparent when insurers stepped in to pay claims following Puerto Rico’s default. With investor confidence renewed, we believe demand will rise for insured municipal bonds and that the market has room to grow. Thus, we believe that insured municipal bonds still have the potential to add value within investor’s portfolios.

That said, investors should keep in mind that some monoline insurers are better positioned than others to step in and pay default claims. This essentially adds an additional layer of analysis when selecting individual bonds. Therefore, relying on an experienced manager that is capable of stress-testing the insurers is prudent within this segment of the muni market.

About risk

Past performance is no guarantee of future results, which will vary. All investments are subject to market risk and will fluctuate in value.

This material represents an assessment of the market environment as at a specific date; is subject to change; and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding the funds or any issuer or security in particular.

The strategies discussed are strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. There is no guarantee that any strategies discussed will be effective.

This material contains general information only and does not take into account an individual’s financial circumstances. This information should not be relied upon as a primary basis for an investment decision. Rather, an assessment should be made as to whether the information is appropriate in individual circumstances and consideration should be given to talking to a financial advisor before making an investment decision.

The up-market capture ratio is used to evaluate how well an investment manager performed relative to an index during periods when that index has risen.

The down-market capture ratio is a statistical measure of an investment manager’s overall performance in down-markets.

The Bloomberg Barclays Insured Municipal Bond Index is a total return performance benchmark for municipal bonds that are backed by insurers with Aaa/AAA ratings and have maturities of at least one year.

The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Municipal Bond Index covers the USD-denominated long-term tax-exempt bond market. The index has four main sectors: state and local general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, insured bonds and prerefunded bonds.

Standard deviation is a statistical measurement in finance that, when applied to the annual rate of return of an investment, sheds light on the historical volatility of that investment. The greater the standard deviation of a security, the greater the variance between each price and the mean, which shows a larger price range.

The Sharpe ratio is a way to examine the performance of an investment by adjusting for its risk. The ratio measures the excess return per unit of deviation in an investment asset or a trading strategy, typically referred to as risk.

“New York Life Investments” is both a service mark, and the common trade name, of the investment advisors affiliated with New York Life Insurance Company. IndexIQ® is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of New York Life Investment Management Holdings LLC and serves as the advisor to the IndexIQ ETFs. ALPS Distributors, Inc. (ALPS) is the principal underwriter of the ETFs. NYLIFE Distributors LLC is a distributor of the ETFs. NYLIFE Distributors LLC is located at 30 Hudson Street, Jersey City, NJ 07302. ALPS Distributors, Inc. is not affiliated with NYLIFE Distributors LLC. NYLIFE Distributors LLC is a Member FINRA/SIPC.

1818753

Eric Snyder

Director, Product Management, New York Life Investments

Eric Snyder is a Director at New York Life Investments focusing on fixed income product management for the MainStay MacKay municipal bond product suite. He joined New York Life in 2019 with over 10 years of industry experience.

Full Bio

Maria Rahni, CFA

Director, Product Management, New York Life Investments

Maria Rahni is a Director in the Product Management group at New York Life Investments, covering IndexIQ’s ETF solutions…

Full Bio

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published.